Просмотр исходного текста страницы Tools And End Production Throughout New York -- Ro3280 Simply Leaves With No Hasta La Vista

This way, all participants were treated equally as payment was not dependent on experimental condition. Because participants were not made aware of this until the data collection was finished, it should not have affected the results. Results and Discussion To measure whether our rejection affected people��s mood, participants were invited three times to indicate on a ��not at all�� (1) to ��very much�� (7) Likert scale how happy, sad, anxious, guilty, and frustrated they felt: before (time 1) and after (time 2) the feedback, and after the subsequent cheating opportunity (time 3). Five repeated-measures ANOVAs with Treatment (accept vs. reject) as the independent variable and [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/erastin.html Erastin nmr] five self-reported mood measures on times 1 and 2 as the dependent variables revealed four interaction effects, indicating our rejection manipulation was successful. Specifically, participants reported: (i) feeling less happy after being rejected, F(1,147) = 109.28, p [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PLK1 Ro3280] ��p2 = 0.08. However, guilt was not affected; see Figure ?Figure11, for a graphical interpretation of the results. Overall, these self-reported mood results indicate that participants�� mood was negatively affected by the rejection. To measure whether rejection also promoted unethical behavior, a chi-square analysis of Treatment on Unethical [http://www.selleckchem.com/products/3-deazaneplanocin-a-dznep.html 3-deazaneplanocin A in vivo] Behavior was performed. As demonstrated in Figure ?Figure22, people behave more unethically after rejection (33.3%) compared to being accepted (18.7%), X2(2) = 4.32, n = 156, p = 0.046, �� = -0.17. The difference between these two conditions was predominantly caused by the participants that quit the experiment. In the accept condition, 14 out of 75 participants cheated (i.e., 61 participants did not cheat). In the unfair rejection condition, 27 out of 81 participants behaved unethically (i.e., 54 participants did not), of which 14 participants cheated by providing the correct definition of kench and 13 quit early. Because the latter group did not complete the mood questionnaires, it was not possible to run a mediation analysis to determine whether mood mediated the effect between rejection and dishonesty. Finally, to measure whether behaving unethically affected people��s emotions, a MANOVA was performed of Unethical Behavior and Treatment on five self-reported mood measures on time 3. This test revealed that people��s emotions after the cheating opportunity were affected by Treatment, F(5,136) = 6.89, p