Researcher Detects Serious Duvelisib Compulsion

Материал из Wiki
Версия от 20:17, 22 февраля 2017; Ounce6tea (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «Beamtime has been awarded under proposal No. II-20100019. The research of LN has been made possible through financial support by the German Academic Exchange Serv…»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая → (разн.)
Перейти к:навигация, поиск

Beamtime has been awarded under proposal No. II-20100019. The research of LN has been made possible through financial support by the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD).""In 2010, we published the validation of a dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT-D) method for the reproduction of molecular crystal structures against 225 high-quality single-crystal (SX) structures (Van de Streek & Neumann, 2010 ?). The same computational technique successfully predicted all four target crystal structures in the 2007 blind test of crystal structure prediction (Day et al., 2009 ?). In the validation study, 225 high-quality crystal structures from SX X-ray data were energy-minimized in full, including Duvelisib nmr the unit-cell parameters. On average, the root mean square (r.m.s.) Cartesian displacement of the non-H atoms upon energy minimization was found to be 0.084?? (Fig. 1 ?). Figure 1 Overlay of a crystal structure with an r.m.s. Bleomycin order Cartesian displacement (RMSCD) value of 0.084??, illustrating the average reproduction of an experimental single-crystal structure by energy minimization with dispersion-corrected density functional ... The 2010 validation paper has shown that a DFT-D energy-minimized structure is a good approximation to a SX structure. Therefore, the DFT-D energy-minimized structure of an X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) structure is a good approximation to what the SX structure would have looked like for that specific XRPD structure. In other words, DFT-D provides us with an approximate SX structure for each XRPD structure! Comparing an XRPD structure with its DFT-D structure therefore allows a semi-quantitative comparison of an XRPD structure with its ��virtual�� SX structure. The use of quantum-mechanical calculations to supplement XRPD data is becoming more and more common these days (see PRDX4 e.g. Neumann et al., 2002 ?; Avila et al., 2008 ?; Florence et al., 2009 ?; Bek? et al., 2010 ?; Blanton et al., 2011 ?, Smr?ok, 2012 ?), but a quantitative benchmark has not been published. In the current paper, we present the results of DFT-D energy minimizations for 215 molecular crystal structures determined from powder diffraction data and published in one of the IUCr journals. It serves as a quantitative benchmark as to what to expect when combining XRPD and DFT-D, and at the same time provides a thorough quantitative analysis of the quality of molecular crystal structures determined from XRPD data. 2.?Methods ? The Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Allen, 2002 ?) was searched for all organic crystal structures determined from powder diffraction data, both X-ray and neutron, with the atomic coordinates reported, and published in Acta Crystallographica Sections B, C or E, the Journal of Applied Crystallography or the Journal of Synchrotron Radiation.