Scary Information About IPI-145

Материал из Wiki
Версия от 21:14, 1 марта 2017; Gander56orange (обсуждение | вклад) (Новая страница: «Data analysis Frequency domain measures of ECG R-R variability were used to estimate the high frequency (HF, 0.15�C0.4 Hz) and low frequency (LF, 0.04�C0.15 H…»)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая → (разн.)
Перейти к:навигация, поиск

Data analysis Frequency domain measures of ECG R-R variability were used to estimate the high frequency (HF, 0.15�C0.4 Hz) and low frequency (LF, 0.04�C0.15 Hz) power. The HF power peak represents modulation of efferent parasympathetic (vagal) activity Oxacillin by ventilation, but only in the presence of sinus rhythm. The LF power peak represents combined modulation of efferent parasympathetic and efferent sympathetic nervous system activity by baroreflex activity. Overall the amplitudes of LF and HF power reflect modulation of sinus node firing rate and the LF/HF ratio (HRV ratio) has been proposed as an index of sympathovagal balance.9,13 However, very LF indices could not be used since they require power spectra that are more than 5 minutes long, which was not in keeping with our experimental protocol. The IWORX Labscribe 2 software which is part of the physiological system was used to analyze these variables (iWorx Sytems, Inc.). SPSS software version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to analyze the data. Independent samples two-tailed Student��s t-test at 5% level of significance was used to compare the various means of the cardiovascular parameters between NBW and LBW individuals (PIPI-145 purchase as well as the heart rate changes are shown in Tables 1 and ?and2,2, respectively. Table 1 Baseline demographic characteristics of the study sample Table 2 Mean heart rates during entire protocol and mean maximum voluntary contraction and time to fatigue HRV ratio The trends of mean HRV ratios for LBW and NBW individuals during the experimental protocol are buy Buparlisib shown in Figure 1. The mean increase in HRV from baseline to exercise was greater for LBW compared to NBW individuals (1.015��1.034 versus [vs] 0.119��0.789, respectively; P