The Top Four Most Asked Questions About Ergoloid

Материал из Wiki
Перейти к:навигация, поиск

3). Compound C ic50 The theoretical EC50 of 2?h exposure of OHE was 1.24?mg/l (Fig. 4). These symptoms continued even after crickets were taken out experimental jars and exposed to fresh air (12�C16?h), suggesting that OHE induces permanent paralysis in crickets (Table 1). Fig. 2 Paralyzed cricket after exposure to OHE (2.0?mg/l, 2?h). Normally, crickets support their body with their legs, but after exposure to OHE, paralysis takes place. Fig. 3 Percentage of affected crickets after exposure to OHE. (A) 0.8?mg/l, (B) 1.2?mg/l, (C) 2.0?mg/l, (D) 4.0?mg/l of OHE (each n?=?10 crickets). Fig. 4 Effect of concentration-dependent exposure to OHE on crickets�� locomotive impairment. Crickets were exposed to different AC220 manufacturer concentrations of OHE for 2?h, then the percentage of crickets that were paralyzed was calculated. Thirty percent ... Table 1 The effect of OHE and related compounds on cricket. The 2?h exposure of 2.0?mg/l of OHE induced complete permanent paralysis in crickets, while only 20�C50% of crickets lost their capability of movement when they were exposed to (E)-2-hexenal, (E)-2-heptenal, (E)-2-octenal and (E)-2-hexen-1-ol under the same conditions. Furthermore, these affected crickets recovered when they were released from exposure and kept under fresh air (Table 1). Other (E)-2-alkenals, (E)-2-pentenal and (E)-2-nonenal, did not affect any crickets. Neither (E)-2-hexene, an unsaturated C-6 hydrocarbon, nor hexanal, a saturated C-6 aldehyde, affected crickets in a visible way (Table 1). 3.2. Depletion of the amount of free thiols in crickets by the exposure of OHE Total amount of free thiols in crickets�� hind legs that were paralyzed after exposure to OHE were lower (30.8?��?5.8?pmol/mg protein in legs) than the ones in control crickets (40.5?��?2.0?pmol/mg protein in legs; P?Ergoloid and 55% (OHE treated?=?2.9?��?0.7?pmol/mg protein in legs, not treated?=?5.3?��?1.9?pmol/mg protein in legs; P?=?0.004; DF?=?15), respectively (Fig.?5B?and?C). Fig. 5 Amount of free thiols in hind legs of crickets. (A) Whole free thiols, (B) protein-derived free thiols, (C) non-protein-derived free thiols. Asterisks indicate that the differences among treatments were significantly different (P?